Claims against governments

At Loopa, we finance litigation and arbitration initiated against the State, its agencies, public companies, or decentralized entities. This type of disputes usually arises when a public administration breaches contracts, expropriates assets, applies regulations arbitrarily, or causes significant economic harm to individuals or companies. These are processes that, although often with solid legal grounds, present a high technical complexity and tend to extend over years, requiring robust financial planning to effectively pursue them. Claims against the State can take multiple forms: claims for unfulfilled administrative contracts, rescinded concessions, stalled works, delayed payments, regulatory measures affecting investments, unjustified denial of licenses, breaches in privatization or nationalization processes, asset confiscation, and also actions for non-contractual liability arising from illegitimate actions or omissions by the administration. In many cases, these disputes not only affect a company's present, but also its future sustainability and reputation in the market. Litigating against the State presents specific challenges. In addition to the prolonged duration of the processes, it is common to face dilatory procedural defenses, constantly changing regulatory frameworks, high evidentiary requirements, and sometimes obstacles to enforcing the judgment once obtained. These factors mean that many companies give up on claiming, even when the harm suffered is significant and the law supports them. In this context, having external financial backing can be crucial to sustain the case over time and maintain the necessary legal pressure. At Loopa, we finance these types of disputes, covering the costs of the process and, when appropriate, advancing a portion of the expected outcome. This allows claimants not only to litigate without tying up their own resources, but also to monetize the claim in advance, which is particularly valuable in the case of prolonged proceedings. If the case is unsuccessful, the client owes nothing, as our participation is structured on a non-recourse model based on the outcome. This approach turns litigation funding into a risk management tool with immediate impact on liquidity and financial predictability. We evaluate high-value economic claims against national, provincial, regional, local governments, as well as state-owned entities. We also fund claims before international tribunals or specialized arbitration courts in State-investor disputes, when the case merits it. We work with national and foreign companies affected by contractual breaches, unilateral interventions, repeated non-payments, or arbitrary regulatory decisions, and collaborate closely with their legal teams to structure a strategy that combines legal rigor and financial strength. Our funding is specifically designed for companies that are entitled to recover what they're owed but cannot or do not want to immobilize resources for years, as well as for law firms representing these clients seeking a solution that allows them to move forward without budgetary constraints. We also support companies facing multiple disputes against public entities and are looking to structure a comprehensive portfolio-based solution. In many countries, litigation against the State requires not only sufficient legal grounds but also financial resilience. At Loopa, we offer that resilience in the form of smart capital: resources to sustain your legal strategy, and immediate liquidity to ease cash flow and reduce the burden of waiting. If you have a well-founded claim against a public entity, we can help finance it and maximize your chances of recovery without putting your finances at risk.