At Loopa, we finance litigation and arbitration arising from environmental damages, a category of dispute that combines high social sensitivity with growing economic and legal relevance. These claims emerge when business activities or government decisions negatively impact the environment, affecting ecosystems, communities, natural resources, or economic assets. They can involve anything from pollutant discharges, deforestation, illegal emissions, to the degradation of watersheds or structural failures in infrastructure projects or extractive industries that cause large-scale damages. Environmental conflicts often require substantial investment in technical consulting, scientific expertise, impact studies, and specialized legal strategies. Additionally, they often involve prolonged litigation against powerful economic or institutional actors, such as multinational companies, concession-based projects, or even the State itself. In this context, accessing justice without financial support can be virtually impossible for victims or those representing their interests. At Loopa, we understand that environmental protection cannot rely solely on the economic resources of the plaintiff. That's why we finance high-impact environmental litigation with clear economic impact and legal merit, both in the judicial and arbitral forums. We cover all costs associated with the process, from legal fees to technical expenses, and we can also advance capital based on the estimated value of the claim. This not only allows sustained legal action over time but also transforms the claim into an immediate source of liquidity for the client. Our non-recourse model ensures that if the case does not succeed, the client does not have to repay the investment. This structure helps remove financial barriers and aligns our interests with those of our clients, focusing resources on maximizing the chances of success and financial recovery. This tool is especially useful for companies or affected groups that wish to litigate robustly without compromising their cash flow or diverting key funds from their core operation. We finance claims for soil, air, or water pollution; impacts on protected areas or vulnerable communities; breaches of environmental regulations in industrial projects; liability for spills, toxic waste, or hazardous emissions; conflicts over unlicensed mining or hydrocarbon exploitation; and damages resulting from public authorities' omissions or negligence in environmental oversight. We also support disputes over environmental compensations, ecological damage claims, and litigations under national and international environmental protection standards. Our financing is aimed at both companies affected by direct or indirect environmental damage and to sustainable project owners harmed by unfair competition or arbitrary regulatory decisions. Likewise, we also partner with law firms leading these types of actions, providing them with the necessary financial support to move forward wwithout budgetary constraints and with the time necessary to build a strong case. In a world of rising environmental awareness and increasingly strict regulation, environmental disputes are set to play an even more central role. At Loopa, we support this shift by providing smart capital to those who choose to demand accountability for damages to the natural environment. We evaluate each case with confidentiality, speed, and legal rigor. If you are facing an environmental claim with merit and economic potential, we can help finance it and turn an ecological conflict into an opportunity for justice and compensation.
Environmental Claims
FAQs
- What happened to Qanlex?
- What does it mean to monetize a lawsuit?
- What expenses does our financing cover?
- How long does it take to analyze a case?
- What is litigation funding?
- Who can apply for funding?
- How is the financing agreement structured?
- What happens if the case is lost?
- How does funding affect case management?
- What percentage does Loopa take?
- What types of cases does Loopa finance?
- Is it debt?
- What are the criteria for investing in a case?