How does funding affect case management?

One of the most common questions regarding litigation funding is whether the fund providing the capital has any influence over the legal strategy of the case. At Loopa, the answer is clear: we do not intervene in legal decisions or the management of the process. The control of the case remains exclusively in the hands of the client and their legal team. The funded party maintains control When Loopa finances a litigation or arbitration, the client and their lawyer retain autonomy over the procedural strategy, including: - Drafting of briefs and pleadings - Selection of experts, witnesses, or technical advisors - Decisions on appeals, settlements, or agreements - The timing and method of enforcing a judgement or award Loopa does not replace the lawyer In all cases, we work alongside the client's lawyer, not in their place. In fact, Loopa carefully selects the cases it finances based, among other things, on the strength of the legal team. Our role is that of a strategic financial partner, providing the necessary resources for the legal strategy to be executed without economic limitations. Furthermore, we do not usually require veto clauses or impose legal directives. We only ask to be kept informed of the progress of the case and that the rights assignment be respected as collateral, to protect our financial participation in the event of success. Benefits of this model - The lawyer preserves their professional independence - The client maintains control over every key decision - Loopa assumes financial risk, but does not influence the legal content of the case - A transparent and interference-free relationship is guaranteed In conclusion, litigation funding does not alter control of the case. The client and their legal team make all strategic decisions, while Loopa provides the necessary capital for the process to unfold without economic restrictions or personal financial risks.